Friday, August 15, 2025

India’s 80 Crore on Free Food: A Global Outlier in Poverty Relief



India’s 80 Crore on Free Food: A Global Outlier in Poverty Relief

In the global south, few welfare programs match the sheer scale of India’s public food distribution system. As of 2025, over 80 crore Indians — roughly 58% of the country’s population — receive free food grains each month under the extended Pradhan Mantri Garib Kalyan Anna Yojana (PMGKAY), alongside the National Food Security Act (NFSA) provisions.

For perspective, that is more than the entire population of the European Union. It’s also nearly twice the population of the poorest 20 African countries combined.


How India Got Here

  • NFSA (2013): Guarantees subsidized rations (₹1–₹3 per kg) to ~81 crore people, covering 75% of rural and 50% of urban populations.
  • PMGKAY (2020 COVID-era): Launched to cushion the pandemic blow, providing free food grains to NFSA beneficiaries. Initially temporary, it has been extended through 2029 at a cost of ₹11.8 lakh crore over 5 years.
  • Scale Today (2025): About 81.35 crore Indians are receiving free food grains every month, making it the largest free food program in human history.

India vs. Africa’s Poorest Countries

While India’s poverty remains a serious challenge, its state capacity and infrastructure for mass welfare distribution are at a level that many low-income African countries have yet to reach.

Key contrasts:

Metric India Poorest African Countries (avg)
Population covered under free/subsidized food ~58% <10% (mostly emergency aid, not ongoing)
Delivery system Nationwide Public Distribution System (PDS), Aadhaar-linked NGO & UN-led food aid, fragmented state systems
Funding Domestic tax revenue & borrowings Largely donor/aid-dependent
Continuity Permanent/long-term Short-term, crisis-specific
Political framing Right to food under law (NFSA) Not a constitutional guarantee in most cases

Case Study Comparisons

  • Ethiopia: Even during the 2022–23 food crisis, only ~20 million people (~15% of population) received emergency food aid, mostly via the World Food Programme (WFP). Distribution was often delayed by conflict and logistics.
  • Malawi: Food distribution covers <5% of population outside crisis years, heavily reliant on external funding.
  • Niger: Chronic food insecurity affects over 40% of population, but sustained free grain distribution is rare — aid comes in pulses, not monthly entitlements.

India’s model is fundamentally different — it is not just a disaster-response mechanism but a standing national entitlement. The government maintains procurement, storage, and transport at massive scale, with an inbuilt legal guarantee to citizens.


The Hidden Challenges

However, the size of India’s food subsidy raises concerns:

  • Fiscal strain: ₹11.8 lakh crore over 5 years is roughly the size of Nigeria’s entire GDP.
  • Dependency trap: Critics argue that long-term free grain distribution can dampen rural labor productivity and distort grain markets.
  • Leakages & corruption: Despite digitization, “ghost” beneficiaries and diversion to black markets remain problems.
  • Exclusion errors: Ironically, ~0.79 crore eligible Indians still wait for inclusion due to outdated census data (2011).

Why Africa Can’t Copy-Paste India’s Model (Yet)

Many African states lack:

  1. Fiscal base – Low tax-to-GDP ratios (often <15%) limit capacity for large welfare budgets.
  2. Procurement & storage – India’s Food Corporation of India (FCI) handles ~80 million tonnes of grain annually; African states often lack such logistics.
  3. Political stability – Prolonged conflicts disrupt long-term schemes.
  4. Legal framework – Few African nations enshrine food as a statutory right.

The Bigger Picture

India’s free food program is both a lifeline and a mirror. It reflects the resilience of its democratic welfare state, but also the scale of poverty that still defines the world’s fifth-largest economy.

For African policymakers, India’s experience offers two lessons:

  • Scale is possible only with sustained political will and stable domestic financing.
  • Food security works best when institutionalized, not improvised during crises.

In the end, while Africa’s poorest nations battle the unpredictability of donor cycles and climate shocks, India has turned food distribution into a national norm. But the fact that more than half its population still depends on free grain is a sobering reminder: growth alone does not erase hunger.



No comments:

Post a Comment